Ahh… (sigh of relief). A more modern read, not to mention the Q&A format made for an interesting style. The reading was rather straightforward, and by the end I wasn’t quite sure what to take from it. I think one of the most relevant points that is pointed out in deliberation is the perspectives of some are pronounced far more than others, even when a diverse group exists. Opinion and bias occur simply from representation, not just stereotypes.
The part concerning people doubting “the evidence of their own senses” was almost gross. How people can be so easily, without even realizing it sometimes, persuaded to think a certain way based on the majority’s opinion, is dangerous. People continue to lose the ability to think fro themselves, and in essence, create new ideas, instead of recycling the same reconstructed ones.
